Skip to main content

Value and Channel

   The changing face of our business has forced all of us in the channel ecosystem to take another     look at our businesses. The market conditions, technology innovations and  and the changing expectation of our end customer today drives the dynamics of the channel ecosystem rather than just product innovation.
    1.Customer: He is looking for a value based solution offering to ensure a better way to manage his heterogeneous & complex technology environment.
    2.Partner: These are the front runners in promoting technology based solutions which help resolve complex business problems
    3.Distributor: More and more, it seems that the distributor is fast becoming an extension to the vendor’s channel team and enabling faster reach to market
    4.Vendor: These are the tech generators, the solution creators, the ones whose solution is promoted by the distributor, enabled by the partner and bought by the customer
       Value is a term of an era gone by. The Channel requires More Value

       More Value ? It means a multi- pronged approach to connect the dots that define the needs of the channel ecosystem to make the entire channel more profitable for all its players.  Encourage customers to adopt new technologies, new services attached to those technologies and financial models that these innovations bring to the fore. Use the channel capabilities to provide to the end customers deeper portfolio of vendor products and its product alliances. 
      The market did. The channel ecosystem responded to align itself. Distys have always offered recruiting and marketing services, to attract VARs to a vendor and help them sell vendor offerings, but that’s not enough; now Distys get that they have to recruit, enable and ramp VARs (in partnership with vendors) to create a win/win/win. The BOTTOM line is that if a disty can’t show a VAR how a particular vendor offering will help them grow their TOP line, the VAD value prop falls apart! Vendors started to see VADs as managers or co-managers of their extended channel. Companies like Cisco are now looking to distributors to manage a part of their SP/VAR channel. What changed?  This role is in contrast to the distributors prior role as a wholesaler of the vendors’ products where the vendor still ‘owned’ the channel relationship.
    Distributors realized that they need to align their business models more closely with their tech vendors. This means that they need to help vendors enable, on-board, and create demand for channel partners through value added services vs. relying on back end sell through.
      VAR’s have struggled alone to create the value proposition for their customers with little or no support from the rest of the ecosystem. Vendors need to design the DNA of their channel programs FIRST and then look to distributors to execute against that blueprint.
       Its fine for distributors to be active partners in the creation of the DNA, but vendors still fall prey to fantasy that distys actually know what the vendors Go-To-Market and channel strategy should be and that if the vendor gives the disty its products, magically, VAR sell through will result. This fantastical thinking leads to disastrous results, because as good as a VAD is at the foundations of channel building, each vendor has a unique Go-To-Market and channel strategy that has to be clearly defined BEFORE a VAD can engage successfully with the vendor.
      VADs execute pieces and parts of this machinery, but lack the right multi-vendor engagement models and a mass customizable back end to scale their VARs’ pipelines
     The design of a channel management system that enables value-added channel to successfully sell customized solutions to end users is an important strategic decision for vendors
      VADs need to create a more compelling demand generation foundation that vendors and SP/VARs can leverage. Ultimately, VADs need to help VARs build demand around multi-vendor offerings that combine a group of non-competing vendors
       While volume-based incentive systems are popular, it is not clear that this compensation structure is appropriate for the VAR channel Vendors need to adopt a different metrics of incentivization for their value channel

Popular posts from this blog


We have been fighting a religion defined definition of “ when did the life of a fetus begin”. It is a trap. The debate around this whole concept is so ridiculous that when you see pages of theories being written about the exact time “life took a birth”

Why I call this entire argument ridiculous is because technically everything is life. A cell is a life. An ant is a life, a plant is a life. Zygotes are life too. However, if you choose to mourn the zygote the same way you chose to mourn taking the dead cells off the bottom off your feet- is a decision you need to make with yourself.

All of these arguments around “life” distract from the actual issue, which is that no human should be required to share their organs with another human. No human should be required to sacrifice their life for another human. The intention or reason behind abortion is irrelevant in the context of the right to bodily autonomy.
I would argue that the Liberal “pro-choice” people who aggressively insist that abortio…


It's about firing the 2020 base. And the mainstream media is helping Trump

When Trump spewed his most preposterous lie about abortion in a rally about how full-term babies were killed by Doctors; do you think no one in the crowd was grown up enough to know that it was a lie? These are full grown people who make more important and logical decisions in their lives every day- what to buy; what to do, where to spend, how to earn a living. Do you think they do not know that Trump was concocting imagery for the benefit of creating a national debate about disgust towards the concept of “abortion”? Abortion is painful. Emotionally, it never leaves a woman. I aborted in 1998, then miscarried in 2008 and 2011. Each time, I named those cells and fetuses, celebrate their lives and created a story for their absence in mine, those cells, which could not find viability, for one reason or the other. So for someone, and these 25 white men, and several others, who have never been through that life-…

The Clock is Ticking : BACKWARD FOR WOMEN

Sometimes it is just a customary sound; but a movement that takes us backward; instead of steering us forward.

2017 and 2018 have been the most regressive years in the progress of women. 

Since Trump became the President of the United States of America, a new culture of suppression of women rights has unleashed worldwide.  He has slowly degraded Women Rights by attacking fair pay legislation, defunding reproductive rights and changing the definition of violence against women. His attitude towards women is evident from the way he treats women and his objectification of the whole gender. In response, the women rights movement has revived itself, only to become negative and vicious.

No one wins when we have to fight. It is still a pity that we have to wave flags, march, hoist posters and commemorate each other on this day every year. We should not have to. 

The global economy could be enriched by about $160tn (£120tn) if women earned as much as men. 

No Zaghari-Ratcliffe should have to be in …