Skip to main content

Someone is profiling you as you surf the internet- How private is the click you just made?

Profiling is a humongous privacy issue especially when data-matching connects the profile of an individual with personally-identifiable statistics of the individual. Digital consumer intelligence is transforming the way companies design, market and manufacture their products and services (Febreze from P&G being the biggest instance of a product based on customer profiling).
There is a multitude of wrapper applications which redirect cookies and cache data to other locations. The process of profiling (also known as "tracking") accumulates and analyzes browsing habits, each attributable to a single initiating entity, in order to gain statistics (arrays of activity) involving the initiating entity. Some organizations participate in the profiling of user’s web browsing and collecting the URLs of sites visited for profiling their preferences. The consequential profiles can hypothetically link with data that personally classifies the individual who did the browsing, thus being useful for market analysis. The aggregate trend analysis does not infringe in privacy of individuals. The profiling of a single user does.
Kaiser Permanente, for instance, has about 3 million registered users on its portal where members plan appointments, share records with healthcare providers and receive apprises on appointments and prescription refills.
Online users are also migrating toward online financial management websites like, which have a huge database of about 5 million registered users. The website is a single stop for banking, investments and credit data and analysis.

Online transactions are now seeing an advent of the concept of personal data lockers that store consumer information and can be linked to multiple retailers, banks and other businesses. For instance, when a buyer purchases a car: the purchase, registration and insurance will all be connected online to the personal data locker. The responsibility for data security and privacy will need to be shared by individuals and companies in the face of transactions moving to an online model. The Law that affirms privacy regulation for financial data is the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to allow institutions to participate and share consumer information amongst themselves. This law requires all concerned to have policies and procedures to ensure security and confidentiality of information that they store and use. The onus of allowing these institutions to share consumer information or not rests on the customer by an “Opt- Out” option. Thus, if a consumer has not explicitly opted out of information sharing; the information will be shared and used by default. However, GLB expects that the Financial Institution has to serve you three notices covering their Privacy Policy, the Right to Opt- Out and the safeguards deployed to prevent unauthorized access to the consumer information. 

Popular posts from this blog


We have been fighting a religion defined definition of “ when did the life of a fetus begin”. It is a trap. The debate around this whole concept is so ridiculous that when you see pages of theories being written about the exact time “life took a birth”

Why I call this entire argument ridiculous is because technically everything is life. A cell is a life. An ant is a life, a plant is a life. Zygotes are life too. However, if you choose to mourn the zygote the same way you chose to mourn taking the dead cells off the bottom off your feet- is a decision you need to make with yourself.

All of these arguments around “life” distract from the actual issue, which is that no human should be required to share their organs with another human. No human should be required to sacrifice their life for another human. The intention or reason behind abortion is irrelevant in the context of the right to bodily autonomy.
I would argue that the Liberal “pro-choice” people who aggressively insist that abortio…


It's about firing the 2020 base. And the mainstream media is helping Trump

When Trump spewed his most preposterous lie about abortion in a rally about how full-term babies were killed by Doctors; do you think no one in the crowd was grown up enough to know that it was a lie? These are full grown people who make more important and logical decisions in their lives every day- what to buy; what to do, where to spend, how to earn a living. Do you think they do not know that Trump was concocting imagery for the benefit of creating a national debate about disgust towards the concept of “abortion”? Abortion is painful. Emotionally, it never leaves a woman. I aborted in 1998, then miscarried in 2008 and 2011. Each time, I named those cells and fetuses, celebrate their lives and created a story for their absence in mine, those cells, which could not find viability, for one reason or the other. So for someone, and these 25 white men, and several others, who have never been through that life-…

The Clock is Ticking : BACKWARD FOR WOMEN

Sometimes it is just a customary sound; but a movement that takes us backward; instead of steering us forward.

2017 and 2018 have been the most regressive years in the progress of women. 

Since Trump became the President of the United States of America, a new culture of suppression of women rights has unleashed worldwide.  He has slowly degraded Women Rights by attacking fair pay legislation, defunding reproductive rights and changing the definition of violence against women. His attitude towards women is evident from the way he treats women and his objectification of the whole gender. In response, the women rights movement has revived itself, only to become negative and vicious.

No one wins when we have to fight. It is still a pity that we have to wave flags, march, hoist posters and commemorate each other on this day every year. We should not have to. 

The global economy could be enriched by about $160tn (£120tn) if women earned as much as men. 

No Zaghari-Ratcliffe should have to be in …